30 Oct
2006
30 Oct
'06
3:39 a.m.
Frederik Eaton
It looks nice, but don't you think the -package-base flag ought to take both the package name *and* the mountpoint?
My intention was that -package-base specifies a base for the package specified in the preceding -package flag [...] In other words, it is an optional argument and the syntax is
ghc ... -package PACKAGE -package-base BASE ...
How about something like ghc ... -package PACKAGE@BASE (where the @BASE part is optional)? -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants