I'm finding it hard to think of a case where (/=) would be any easier to define than (==).
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:43 AM Tom Ellis < tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2017@jaguarpaw.co.uk> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 04:39:21PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I am revisiting some educational material about Haskell, and I stumble over something that I keep stumbling over. I thought there was prior discussion, but I couldn’t find it (operators hard hard to google for).
Why does Eq have a (/=) method?
Perhaps sometimes it is easier to define (/=) and use the default definition of (==) in terms of it? _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
-- brandon s allbery kf8nh allbery.b@gmail.com