20 Jul
2014
20 Jul
'14
5:45 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 20/07/14 21:34, David Feuer wrote:
I don't know how it compares to Alexander's implementation My branch only has the naïve uncons. I do not have unsnoc at all. I am happy to add it. I.e., I am +0 on adding unsnoc. I do not have much input on which of the proposed implementations are better. I think we need benchmarks.
Alexander alexander@plaimi.net https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlPMOHsACgkQRtClrXBQc7VIcgD/Y0C20WdsITc0XDOlJ21Luaa6 btzX8T326IDWyCCBSV8A/A98Li3pPrjOiNiHuQOY80dXbsSbjc4nLzlTVzqx12L7 =4Z2O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----