Hello Malcolm, Friday, October 20, 2006, 3:20:17 PM, you wrote:
Any suggestions for a good name for such a module? Data.Function does not sound right to my ears.
some *.Base? at least in GHC, GHC.Base module holds them all
But the whole point is that these functions are in *no* way implementation-specific! They are very general, very "basic" indeed, but basic to the language, not a compiler.
i highlighted the _Base_ part of module name, not the _GHC_ part :) but Combinators looks better, i agree or maybe Data.Function for functions on functions - $, flip, on and appropriate datatype modules for type-specific operations (Data.Tuple for mapFst/mapSnd and so on) -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com