Hello John, Saturday, February 04, 2006, 10:54:35 PM, you wrote:
JM> It would be nice if a 'FastByteArray' could be pulled out of JM> FastPackedString since it is a very useful thing in its own right.
are UArray/IOUArray/StorableArray is not appropriate?
JM> appropriate building blocks, but their interfaces are rather austere JM> compared to FastPackedString, and it would nice to have all of its JM> options available in something not dedicated just to strings, since we JM> have already implemented them in any case. so it seems logical to add these interfaces to all arrays or at least all unboxed arrays? this also corresponds with problem of having common collections interface, what is a goal of J.P. Bernardy -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulatz@HotPOP.com