3 Jun
2020
3 Jun
'20
2:40 p.m.
(I certainly don't want to pile on, just want to emphasize a really important point which I've learned over the years shipping lots of software... which, while not perfect in any way, has certainly worked "well enough") On 03/06/2020 15.55, dominic@steinitz.org wrote:
not wait another 5 years for perfection (which may never arrive).
Aka. "perfect is the enemy of good". Unless it can be shown that these changes to the 'random' library *actively* prevent any later improvements[0], I'd say that this aphorism applies rather... good. [0] Specific suggestions would be necessary for credibility. Regards,