Re: Who needs and wants parallelism-friendly core libs?

I'm happy to do that as well if you feel strongly, it just requires more administrivia to coordinate, and the network graph on github shows the activity across repositories anyways, so I tend to work by fork and pull request, as I'm much more comfortable collapsing history on a repository off to on side than I am on the official repo. *shrug* -Edward On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Edward Kmett wrote:

...

If nobody has any objections, we can use that as a sort of staging ground for this sort of change before they filter up to the main repository.

I don't have a problem with you working on vector, but why wouldn't you just stage stuff on a branch in the main repo? If you do it in your own repo, that makes it effectively invisible to other people.