Re: version control and LIP

I didn't mean to imply anything negative about darcs. I couldn't do that because I haven't had a chance to become familiar with it. My bias is also to learn darcs first because it is written in Haskell. I think that is a legitimate argumentl However, it hasn't been established that it has to be darcs or arch. I understand what Krasimir is saying (that everyone has a limited amount of time) but that really is irrelevant to the technical discussion. Seth Krasimir Angelov wrote:

--- Isaac Jones wrote:

...

Krasimir Angelov writes:

...

Does the arch works under Windows?

It seems that there is some support, as you've already discovered. Apparently, cygwin is only one out of 3 options:

http://wiki.gnuarch.org/moin.cgi/Native_20WIN32_20Support

...

I hope you can solve this problem. Perhaps this is another reason I should move to darcs? How's darcs support in windows?

I will try to install the native arch package but if we need to choice between arch and darcs I will prefer darcs. I both case I need to learn a new tool which is a disadvantage for me. I prefer the darcs because it is written in Haskell and because I found the theory of patches very original. Of course these arguments are very subjective and the real arguments will be stability, portability and supported features.

Cheers, Krasimir

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

!DSPAM:4055694a91924469820903!