On Wednesday 07 May 2003 18:34, Matthew Donadio wrote:
Any other thoughts?
Name redundancy: Poly.Poly, Poly.polysubst Is this redundancy essential? You are assuming the user will include the module's scope, right? Polynomial functions: the scientific computing community has a great variety of algorithms for solution of numerical problems you might find many things of use in their writings. Just an off-the-top-of my head remark. There is surely a lot to be done in mathematical libraries. I had looked for a clean, small DCT routine and I had to write it myself when I implemented a sound synthesizer. (I just wrote the formula as it is so it wasn't efficient :) ) Regards, -- Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr> Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara KDE Project: http://www.kde.org www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo Malfunction: http://mp3.com/ariza GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C