I rather like label. +1 from me. On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 1:25 AM Tom Ellis < tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2017@jaguarpaw.co.uk> wrote:
replay :: MonadCont m => m (m a) replay = callCC $ pure . fix
Using this in a do-notation block allows one to bind a name to the sub-block that starts immediately after. I reached for continuations to try to get this behavior for use with recursive flows without disrupting the reading of the main forward flow and found how to do it in https://jsdw.me/posts/haskell-cont-monad/ under
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 03:25:16AM +0000, Alexandre Esteves wrote: the
name "goto".
While "goto" is as familiar as a name can be, I feel "replay" more accurately conveys, that you can only 'go back', by stating what actually is happening - that a sub-block we're currently evaluating is replayed from its beginning.
Looks like a "label" more than a "goto" to me. Would "label" be a good name? _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries