Data.Sequence uses the same precedence for both, which strikes me as a bit sad.
Surprisingly, I am not seeing other packages on Hackage that define similar
operators.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 2:50 PM Andreas Abel
My hunch would be too look at what the others do to form an opinion.
On 2020-08-13 19:26, David Feuer wrote:
I'm trying to work out appropriate precedences for operators and pattern synonyms in my brand-new compact-sequences package. I currently have stacks and queues, but I will soon have deques, so let's pretend. For consistency, operators will match pattern synonyms.
(<|), pattern (:<) :: a -> Deque a -> Deque a (|>), pattern (:>) :: Deque a -> a -> Deque a
:< and :> need to have different precedence to allow things like
a :< b :< xs :> c :> d
to work nicely, but what numbers should I pick?
I also have cons and snoc functions. Should I give their backticked spellings fixity declarations? If so, with what precedences?
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries