I'm still in favour of this so a +1 from me. For completeness, your proposal should also specify from which module this will be exported and what the fixity and precedence will be. Bas Op 18 feb. 2017 05:41 schreef "Siddhanathan Shanmugam" < siddhanathan+eml@gmail.com>: This was proposed about 7 years ago, and rejected at the time: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3962 Is it okay if I revive this argument now? I think it would be useful to have the lens operator <&> in base, which is defined as: (<&>) :: Functor f => f a -> (a -> b) -> f b as <&> f = f <$> as This is analogous to a lifted version of (&) that already present in Data.Function Cheers, Sid _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries