Hello Henning, Tuesday, January 29, 2008, 6:35:28 PM, you wrote:
In consider Bulat's point as preservation of unfavorable coding style (namely unqualified anonymous import). This method does not scale well and you can motivate stop of any development this way. So I object to Bulat's argument, but not necessarily vote particularly for concatMapM, since I didn't need it so far - which can also mean, that I have always worked-around it without noticing it.
so you will prefer to add it immediately to 6.8.*? i wonder how much code you write and which tool you use. my tools can't automatically insert these imports and i don't have time to do this monkey work by hand - and anyway i consider as bad programming style trying to replace package manager with home-grown tricks. the actual problem is hard-wired base package -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com