Re: Proposal: Add (&) to Data.Function

Cale Gibbard writes:

On 22 November 2012 11:46, Johan Tibell wrote:

...

On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Joachim Breitner wrote:

...

Hi,

-1 for adding such an operator at all. Languages benefit from consistnet idiom; too many ways of doing the same thing are not always good.

-1 for me for the same reason. After looking at examples in this thread I don't find that the loss in readability is worth it.

Also for beginners I don't want to explain yet another way to write function application.

-1 for more or less the same reason.

And -1 from me for the same reason. The more ways there are of writing the same thing, the more effort it takes to read them. -- Jón Fairbairn Jon.Fairbairn@cl.cam.ac.uk