Re: Proposal: Data.Bool.implies

+1 For not changing the Ord instance for Bool. It would be disastrous. As an aside, is the Order instance for Bool in the report? On Jan 22, 2016 12:24 PM, "Iavor Diatchki" wrote:

Please don't change the ordering on Bool---it's been like that forever and it might lead to extremely subtle bugs that won't be caught by the compiler.

I am ambivalent about adding an `implies` function as long as it is not automatically in scope. However, can anyone give some examples of using this in your code? All the ones I could think of would seem easier to follow when written with `if-then-else` or a guard.

-Iavor

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Felipe Lessa wrote:

...

+1 for either Data.Bool.implies or Data.Bool.(==>).

+1 for right-associativity.

Cheers,

-- Felipe.

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries