28 Mar
2017
28 Mar
'17
3:48 p.m.
There are a number of intermediate lists that are certainly non-empty, but
their types don't reflect that. I wonder if using a non-empty list type
unpacked into the list of lists might be helpful.
On Mar 28, 2017 3:39 PM, "Gregory Popovitch"
OK, here is the current proposed change - tests look good:
Any comments/opposition from the community?
Thanks,
greg
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
