
There is precedent in the arrow literature for calling this function "dup".
For example, on page 55 of this paper:
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/arrows-jfp/arrows-jfp.pdf
-- Dan Burton
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 12:48 AM David Feuer
I'm not opposed. Should this be called dup or diagonal? What about larger tuples?
Side note: \x -> (x,x) = join (,)
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018, 6:03 PM Ivan Perez
wrote: Dear all,
The function \x -> (x,x) is very convenient when working with arrows.
Would it be appropriate to add it to Data.Tuple?
Cheers,
Ivan
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries