
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Nikita Volkov
wrote: On Jun 23, 2013, at 10:11 PM, Henning Thielemann wrote: > If in future Prelude moves more and more to one most general function that does everything given the right type, then I am really concerning to use NoImplicitPrelude in all my modules and use a custom Prelude or none at all. That's exactly what I am doing now and the very existence of a dozen of "prelude" projects on hackage suggests that I'm hardly alone in that.
Except that most of them are making things *more* general, whereas Henning believes polymorphism is evil and confusing.
I use 'fmap' a lot myself. I only do not see why to alter Prelude, because you can import everything you need from Data.List, Data.Functor and friends.