Adrian Hey wrote:
Maybe if we call what I've produced Multimedia.SDL.Core, though since it actually includes SDL_image and SDL_ttf also, maybe I should split these out to produce.. Multimedia.SDL.Core Multimedia.SDL.Image Multimedia.SDL.TTF so anybody who felt inclined to write a binding for one of the many SDL extension libraries could use Multimedia.SDL.<whatever> (Or maybe my "Core" binding should still be just Multimedia.SDL?)
"Core" is not very descriptive IMHO, what about staying close to the structure of the SDL library documentation (e.g. http://sdldoc.csn.ul.ie/): Multimedia.SDL.General Multimedia.SDL.Video Multimedia.SDL.Window Multimedia.SDL.Events ... and using Multimedia.SDL as a collector module for everything below it? Cheers, S.