Re: Haskell Extensions in various compilers (Cabal)

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:21:43 -0400, Isaac Jones wrote:

...

Oh, also, somehow I didn't see "constructor-less data types" on the list of extensions anywhere. Does this fall under something I'm missing? Should I call it ConstructorlessDataTypes?

Martin Sjögren writes:

If you mean restricted type synonyms (http://cvs.haskell.org/Hugs/pages/users_guide/restricted-synonyms.html), I think the constructor should be called RestrictedTypeSynonyms. :)

Or, if you mean something like data Dummy a; then how about EmptyDataDecls or VoidDataTypes? Regards, Malcolm P.S. nhc98 permits them by default.