
Reading the OverloadedLists wiki seems to agree with Zemlya. It's not
unreasonable at all to treat it as a hint IMO, but we should definitely be
consistent, since again, primitive treats any length other than the hint as
an error.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, 7:40 PM Zemyla
I'm kind of the opposite. I think the number given to fromListN should be a "size hint", not a redundant coding of the size of the list given.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, 21:31 chessai .
wrote: I expect a list with precisely length N, and reject anything else. IIRC both primitive and vector do this
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, 6:54 PM Carter Schonwald < carter.schonwald@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey everyone: When you see fromListN as a function in a library, do you assume / presume it’s expecting an exactly N element list ? Or do you expect/tolerate other behavior ?
Should it reject shorter lists?
Should it truncate or reject longer lists?
A corner case of this came up in some bug discussion I was having regarding vector, and I shall claim and or presume that most folks assume exact size with prompt rejection of too long or too short.
Thoughts please ?
-Carter _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries