j
k
j a
j l
............Daniel Trstenjak writes:
.........Daniel Trstenjak writes:
......Daniel Trstenjak writes:
...Daniel Trstenjak writes:
Daniel Trstenjak writes:
There are '$' and '$!', so it's just pity that '<$>' and '<$!>' would break this naming consistency, because '<$!>' wouldn't be the strict version of '<$>'.
I agree with Daniel. John
Back to the thread
Back to the list
