Re: Proposal: splitting the network package

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Kazu Yamamoto wrote:

Hello,

If I did not miss messages, many in favor of this proposal and no against. So, I think we reached clear consensus on splitting the network package.

One problem is naming. The author of the "uri" package dislikes to rename it (to cgi-uri for example).

So, I would like to take "network-uri" as I originally proposed. What do you guys think?

I think it's good enough.