On Sun, 19 May 2013, Anthony Cowley wrote:
I think this issue may be too big to rely on mailing list +1s. Is there any precedent for having a web-based poll of some sort? We often get more engagement in debates on IRC and /r/haskell than the mailing list, so let's not let the choice of forum drive the result.
I also consider the proposal to be a pretty big thing. I am not sure that all people who are affected are aware of this discussion, especially since it happens under the subject "add whenJust". Changing the Prelude was only done for 'catch' as far as I remember. Moving Traversable and Foldable to Prelude is for me a precedent. It has more implications: I think it must also go into the Haskell 201x specification. It would mean that Traversable and Foldable are immediately in scope in every module. And what is the long-term goal? Shall Prelude contain all classes, that generalize Prelude's types? Applicative? Category? Monoid? MonadPlus? Semigroup? If you think this out, you may want not to do the first step in this direction. The reason for the proposal is really only to save writing some "import" statements for people who prefer the unqualified import style, right? I still think it is much simpler to achieve this by putting more effort in alternative Prelude projects.