24 Sep
2009
24 Sep
'09
4:23 p.m.
Ah, you are right. I was being to clever for my own good :-) Perhaps it works for all types where I used the "rnf x = rnf (x == x)" trick. Should I attach a new patch to the ticket with those definitions changed?
Sure, that would be helpful.
I have updated the patch attached to the ticket.