6 Apr
2014
6 Apr
'14
4:09 a.m.
On 2014-04-06 at 00:33:34 +0200, Henning Thielemann wrote:
Am 06.04.2014 00:27, schrieb Niklas Haas:
[...]
This already exists in the form of
sortBy . comparing
or
sortBy (comparing f)
Not exactly, because sortByKey memorizes the results of 'f' and (sortBy . comparing) recomputes 'f' all the time.
...what about a RULE that replaces "sortBy . comparing" by an internal non-exported "sortByKey"?