15 Mar
2005
15 Mar
'05
4:44 a.m.
On 15 March 2005 07:04, Isaac Jones wrote:
Folks have listed these libraries as needing better documentation. Is anyone around who is familiar with these who can add some haddock patches?
Are people using Text.Html? I've been wondering whether it ought to be replaced, or at least revamped. Haddock uses a local version of this library with a number of fixes. The HTML library in WASH seems better, but I haven't investigated it thoroughly. Or perhaps HTML (XHTML to be precise) should just be a special case of an XML library? Anyone interested enough to take this on? Cheers, Simon