Edward Kmett-2 wrote
The current design is that -Wcompat will be off by default and includes warnings that are not in -Wall and that we'll be introducing warnings into -Wall when they become actionable under a 3 release policy rather than the more eager approach you are advocating here.
Yes, I understand that that is the current design, and I'm asking whether this could be adjusted. Do we lose anything by the proposed change to the policy, other than authors who want 3-release -Wall-clean code adding an extra flag? (Or maybe I just didn't understand you - are you saying that introducing new warnings are not a bottleneck for any changes?) -- View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/3-release-policy-and-Wno-compat-tp58232... Sent from the Haskell - Libraries mailing list archive at Nabble.com.