
I also consider this a bugfix. Bugfixes (hopefully) change semantics and break backwards-compatibility (but in a good way). +1 for fixing and backporting as far as possible. On 06.01.2015 08:53, Milan Straka wrote:
Hi all,
-----Original message----- From: "Edward Z. Yang"
Sent: 5 Jan 2015, 14:25 I propose to backwards incompatibly change the behavior of removeDirectoryRecursive to not follow symlinks. We could optionally add a replacement function under a new name which does follow symlinks.
+1 to changing behaviour of removeDirectoryRecursive.
-1 to depreciation cycle and a replacement function.
To me, this feels like bugfixing, not backwards incompatible change, as the current behaviour is unexpected and potentially harmful.
Cheers, Milan Straka _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
-- Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers and Gothenburg University, Sweden andreas.abel@gu.se http://www2.tcs.ifi.lmu.de/~abel/