Re: #4189: Add (<.>) operator (generalizing (.) to Functor)

1 Aug 2010


      On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, John Meacham wrote:
...
Then clearly we should use this as the operator.
...
.--.
                   ."  o \__
                _.-"    ,(  `
            _.-"      ,;;|
       _.-=" _,"    ,,;;;'
   .-"`_.-"``-..,,;;;;:'
   `"'`          `\`\
                  /^\\\
We will just have to tweak the layout rule a little to accept it..
That's the best proposal for an infix operator I have ever seen! However, 
I'm afraid that GHC will reject it since the bird's eye is a letter.

Re: #4189: Add (<.>) operator (generalizing (.) to Functor)

Henning Thielemann