Re: Haskell library infrastructure coordinator

Peter Simons writes:

Ketil Z Malde writes:

...

Alastair Reid writes:

...

Let's make version numbered releases the standard.

...

Yes, I absolutely agree, of course. The important part is distributing source, which is simple and will work well in most cases.

I agree as well. Following the CVS repository is for library developers. Regular releases should be provided and, if possible, should come with of the compilers.

Whenever people mention altering or shipping something with the compilers, red flags go up in my brain. I think that one of the reasons for this project is to decouple more stuff from the compiler distributions. In general, I'd like to steer the discussion about distribution toward things that integrate with packaging systems like dpkg & FreeBSD's ports. I would like to see a system flexible enough that: - Authors can distribute libraries & tools from their web pages in a way that makes it very easy for users to download and use them. - Packagers for various OSs have a sane way to create packages. - Compiler distributions can hook into a set of libraries that consensus says most people will want by default (but may not be a part of the Haskell standard). We might call this "hslibs". In debian, ghc5 might depend on hslibs-ghc5, which will in turn depend on a bunch of small packages. And more optionally: - A central repository of useful Haskell libraries can be maintained in a way that blends the best of cathedral & bazaar. How do you feel about that way of putting it? peace, isaac