20 Jul
2007
20 Jul
'07
5 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:16:52AM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Friday, July 20, 2007, 3:14:11 AM, you wrote:
Is there a reason not to move this, perhaps renaming it in the process, to the base package (or possibly elsewhere in the future, but in the short term I might want to use it in base)?
backward compatibility.
I don't think that's really an issue here. I can't imagine anything would break if we moved it to base without renaming it, and if we did rename it then we could have a module with the old name in unix re-exporting it. Thanks Ian