On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:31:51PM +0100, Bjorn Bringert wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007, at 23:13 , Henning Thielemann wrote:
I like to see MTL split into a Haskell98 part and an advanced part. I mostly use functionality which would nicely fit into a Haskell98 interface and find it annoying that by importing MTL my code becomes less portable.
Yes! Please!
You mean something like http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/mtl-split ? The plan is to split Control.Monad.Identity, Control.Monad.Trans and Control.Monad.Trans.* off into a separate portable, low-level package.
I noticed that I frequently use (flip runReader, flip evalState) for point-free programming. What was the reason to choose the current order? What is the experience of other programmers?