25 Apr
2005
25 Apr
'05
8:21 p.m.
"S. Alexander Jacobson"
4. A set of modules may be dependent on a set of packages if and only if that set of packages is the only set of packages that may contain them.
I don't understand. What does this mean? Modules must be contained by a package to depend on that package?
5. Since more than one set of packages may contain the same set of modules, the current Haskell story cannot be consistent with the current Cabal story.
Why can't multiple packages have the same set of modules? -- Programming is the Magic Executable Fridge Poetry, | www.ScannedInAvian.com It is machines made of thought, fueled by ideas. | -- Shae Matijs Erisson