Re: Proposal: Don't require users to use undefined

27 Oct 2010

      On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Michael Snoyman  wrote:
...
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Bas van Dijk  wrote:
...
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Michael Snoyman  wrote:
...
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Bas van Dijk  wrote:
...
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Henning Thielemann
 wrote:
...
4. In the future you may deprecate the immediate use of 'sizeOf' and
'alignment'.
We could deprecate sizeOf immediately in favor of sizeOfTagged.
Deprecating it doesn't break any code but does gives warnings so that
users are encouraged to upgrade. I don't see a reason to wait.
We can't immediately switch to using sizeOfTagged since many people
will still be using old versions of base. If we waited one cycle to
deprecate the old functions, it won't annoy people. By the next cycle,
in theory a majority of people will already have sizeOfTagged, and it
would be feasible to switch our code to sizeOf.
Yes, that's what I meant. We should {-# DEPRECATE #-} sizeOf now and
provide sizeOfTagged as an alternative. In a further cycle we can
remove sizeOf.
My point is that if you use DEPRECATE immediately, no one will be able
to compile with -Wall -Werror. No one can reasonably switch over to
sizeOfTagged until at least the next cycle, and by putting in a
deprecation immediately, we'll start generating warnings immediately
for writing code in the only reasonable way possible.
Ok I get your point. Then we could at least put a note in the
documentation that sizeOf is soon to be deprecated in favor of
sizeOfTagged.

(BTW Note that base-4.3 will also be deprecating block and unblock in
favor of mask. Maybe that should follow this procedure as well.)

Bas