24 Nov
2006
24 Nov
'06
12:25 p.m.
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 13:00 +0100, Sven Panne wrote:
Am Freitag, 24. November 2006 12:23 schrieb Duncan Coutts:
[...] Um, no it isn't. fps 0.9 is completely API compatible with the current version. It's a performance upgrade only. We are not breaking API.
We knew this when we had it included in base, so we trimmed the API down to make it supportable. We have no problem following the rules.
If this is the case, there is no reason to *not* include fps 0.9 in "base" for 6.6.1.
Yes, this was our original plan.
If we all agree that it would be better to have it somewhere else, we can do this for 6.8.
Sure. Duncan