On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Iavor Diatchki wrote:
Different packages can provide modules with the same name, so it seems perfectly reasonable to let programmers choose the names for their modules.
What you say here seems to be somewhat at odds with what is written in the below documentation: http://www.haskell.org/hierarchical-modules/libraries/reference-libraries.ht... Specifically where it says: ``If, however, you are providing a library for any other part of the hierarchy [not in User or Org], then the module names in the should be allocated.'' Your disagreement might be okay. This documentation is quite old, and might be out of date. However, if this is the case then might I suggest it either be removed from haskell.org or somehow marked as being obsolete. -- Russell O'Connor http://r6.ca/ ``All talk about `theft,''' the general counsel of the American Graphophone Company wrote, ``is the merest claptrap, for there exists no property in ideas musical, literary or artistic, except as defined by statute.''