Re: Proposal: deepseq should not depend on containers

Am 10.01.2011 17:27, schrieb Johan Tibell:

I've summarized the discussion here: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4868#comment:4

Ian and Christian, I'm not sure what you're feeling on the proposal are. Could you please give a more explicit opinion either for or against?

I withdraw my proposal regarding "orphaned instances" since this does not fit into the current infrastructure. I do not vote against it or for it. Any choice is fine for me. I think the best is to move Control.DeepSeq to base and also move the array instance into the array package. Christian

Thanks,

Johan