Re: cpphs and C++-style comments

Malcolm Wallace wrote:

Sven Panne wrote:

...

On Friday 14 September 2007 22:06, Malcolm Wallace wrote:

...

In particular, we could swap --strip back to mean what it used to mean (the current --strip-c89 behaviour), and find a new name for the eol-stripping flag.

That seems to be the right way IMHO.

OK, done. The new option name is --strip-eol, and --strip-c89 is gone.

I'd rather name the flag --strip-cc or something like that, indicating that it refers to C++ comments (--strip-cpp might be misleading, though). Cheers Ben