I'm generally +1, but I still don't really like the names "lookupLess"
or "findLess". It just doesn't invoke the right association. Maybe
something that shows the relation to findMin/Max? E.g., something
more along the lines of "lookupMaxBelow", "lookupMinAbove".
On 2 March 2012 18:52, Twan van Laarhoven
On 12/02/12 14:14, Twan van Laarhoven wrote:
Discussion deadline: 2 weeks from now; Sunday, 26 February 2012.
The deadline for discussion has passed. There were no explicit votes for or against, but 4 reactions that count as positive, and 1 as unconvinced.
The only issue seems to be the names:
Thanks for the benchmark. In light of this and your other arguments I think we should add the functions. Lets settle on the names.
I have made a case for /lookup(Less|Greater)(Equal)?/, based on the fact that lookup* functions return "Maybe x" values, while find* functions return values without a maybe wrapper. But I don't really care that much. Flipping a coin between "find" and "lookup" will also work for me :)
Twan
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
-- Push the envelope. Watch it bend.