19 Jun
2007
19 Jun
'07
11:34 a.m.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, dons@cse.unsw.edu.au (Donald Bruce Stewart) wrote:
nad:
It turns out that, although the code I posted earlier in this thread now works, the larger piece of code which I am actually interested in running does not...
However, we'll need a test case, so more info please! :-)
I took a closer look at the issue today, and apparently the problem yesterday was caused by me. Hence you can disregard the second bug report. :) Thanks for the bug fix. Was the problem caused by code breaking the documented "rules" for safe usage of some unsafe function? If not, maybe some documentation should be updated to avoid similar problems in the future. -- /NAD