I think the MonadPlus instance should probably have a MonadPlus constraint,
since MonadPlus makes a sort of statement about the interaction between >>=
and mplus, even if it's a bit of an ambiguous one.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, 12:30 AM Fumiaki Kinoshita
This is another part of https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/merge_requests/644, which is presumably much less controversial:
Generic (Kleisli m a b) Functor m => Functor (Kleisli m a) Applicative m => Applicative (Kleisli m a) Alternative m => Alternative (Kleisli m a) Monad m => Monad (Kleisli m a) (Alternative m, Monad m) => MonadPlus (Kleisli m a) _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries