Re: Who needs and wants parallelism-friendly core libs?

Fair enough. I had missed that fact! In that case, we could bring vector under the arm of the core libraries committee, or we could seek a more direct maintainer. [Adding Geoffrey Mainland to the To: list] Geoffrey, would you be willing to pick up maintainership? I mention it mostly because I know your recent SIMD work has been very vector-centric, and you are the person most likely to affect it's course in the near term. If not, I could pick it up personally, or we could put it under the core libraries committee. -Edward On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Edward Kmett wrote:

...

I'd like to hash this out a bit further. As this issue affects vector primarily, it is outside of the scope of the core library committee per se, and is largely up to Roman as the maintainer of vector.

Remember that Roman has fairly explicitly resigned as the maintainer of vector for want of time, so someone else needs to take up the crusade here.