I've ported part of the Leksah metadata collection to use Haddock. But, now it comes, I have not created another backend, but would like to use Haddock as a library and call "createInterface" directly. So I need to change the exposed-modules section of haddock.cabal file to include: "Haddock.Types Haddock.Interface Haddock.Options" Would that be an acceptable patch for the general release, or do you feel it to be too unhygienic or something? The decision came because: 1. Leksah needs to write a binary format, so that the backend would have introduced new dependencies. (binary, binary-shared) 2. Leksah collects information from a variety of sources dynamically and needs a more flexible approach: - .hi files(installed packages without sources), - haddock (packages with sources that compiles) - parsing sources (projects you work on, which may for now not typecheck or compile). This can be better and more efficiently be implemented with a library approach. Jürgen -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Can-the-Haddock-library-expose-more-%28then-just-readi... Sent from the Haskell - Libraries mailing list archive at Nabble.com.