4 Jul
2008
4 Jul
'08
3:22 p.m.
On 2008 Jul 4, at 9:56, Simon Marlow wrote:
In fact, this applies to catchAny too. It should come with a strong warning, and a suggestion that any unrecognised exceptions should be re-thrown. Most uses of catchAny are to implement
Given that it just tries a catch with each exception in the list, why couldn't it automatically re-throw if none matches? -- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH