
23 Jun
2013
23 Jun
'13
1:39 a.m.
Gabriel Gonzalez
writes:
I'm in favor of generalizing `map`. At first I was wary of less monomorphic types, but now I've found that it's not that hard to just lie and pretend the type is more specialized when teaching. Plus, `map` is a much nicer name than `fmap`.
+1, pending results on how it affects foldr/build fusion. -- John Wiegley FP Complete Haskell tools, training and consulting http://fpcomplete.com johnw on #haskell/irc.freenode.net