Re: [Haskell-cafe] Monad of no `return` Proposal (MRP): Moving `return` out of `Monad`

Sven Panne writes:

If you take e.g. (<$>) which is now part of the Prelude, you can't simply import some compatibility module, because GHC might tell you (rightfully) that that import is redundant, because (<$>) is already visible through the Prelude.

Yes, the proper solution is slightly more complicated than just importing Prelude.Compat [1]. You also have to specify "import Prelude ()" -- or compile with NoImplicitPrelude, if you prefer that kind of thing. Best regards Peter [1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-compat-0.8.2/docs/Prelude-Compat.htm...