21 Mar
2011
21 Mar
'11
9:41 p.m.
Tyson Whitehead schrieb:
My proposal (although I'm sure someone must have brought this up before, so it's more of a question) is why not take the magic away from seq by making it a class function like deepSeq
class Seq a where seq :: a -> b -> b
Last round of this discussion was: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-August/081308.html