Duncan Coutts
One possibility would be to update to the latest cpphs unlit code, but for that of course we'd need your permission as the copyright licenses are different.
The unlit code in cpphs was largely taken from an early version of the Haskell Report.
Does that mean you do give us permission, or that you think we don't need your permission? I just want it to be clear, because cpphs is mostly LGPL and Cabal is BSD3.
I meant that the code is not mine, so you do not need my permission. An acknowledgement that the code was in the Haskell 1.2 Language Report is probably sufficient.
To be honest I think it'd be easier at the moment to update the unlit code rather than using cpphs --unlit
Yes, probably a better strategy. Use a library rather than an external tool (unless there are licensing issues to prevent it, which in this case there are not). Regards, Malcolm