On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 03:41:22PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Ross Paterson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:00:59PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
However, I would not mind such a class if it eases other implementions, but from a user's point of view, I want different modules with the same interface (and as few as possible class constraints).
Which "same way"? I'm happy with small and useful classes.
Perhaps the problem is that the classes proposed so far for sequences and other collections have been rather heavy-weight things with a lot of members. Maybe if there were an interface that resisted the temptation to throw everything into the class you would be happier?
You should ask me, how I feel about the Num class, but maybe even this class is not well suited as comparison with the big "Sequence" class.
So how do you feel about the Num heirarchy? Peace, Dylan